Sidney R. Bresnick

LL.B., Boston College Law School
S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology
B.S., Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Massachusetts (Amherst)

Sidney R. Bresnick, Esq.
Phone:  (646) 723-9975
Facsimile:  (212) 202-3819

Sid Bresnick is recognized for Intellectual Property Litigation and was most recently selected to the 2015 New York Metro Super Lawyers List for demonstrated excellence in the practice of law.  Sid has been honored to receive the 2015 Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory’s “AV Preeminent” peer review rating, its highest possible rating for both legal ability and ethical standards, the most recent of over 20 years of such recognition.   Sid Bresnick is a patent litigator with extensive experience in all phases of trial and appellate practice. He is a former partner of the prestigious intellectual property law firms Pennie & Edmonds and Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, and has served as counsel to other major law firms, including Wiggin & Dana in New Haven, Connecticut, and Morgan & Finnegan and Cohen Pontani Lieberman & Pavane, in New York City, prior to joining Meredith & Keyhani, PLLC as of counsel.   He is a member of the New York City Bar Association.

Sid has represented many major U.S. and foreign companies, including The B.F. Goodrich Company, Exxon, DuPont, Huntleigh Technology, American Brands, C.R. Bard, Catalina Marketing Corp., Ahlstrom Windsor Locks, LLC and MAN Roland, Inc., among others, in complex patent infringement and trade secrets cases involving such varied subject matter as computer systems, communications, medical devices, food processing, petroleum and plastics products and processes, business equipment, pharmaceuticals, paper manufacturing and printing presses.

Sid is admitted to the bar in the State of New York, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third and Federal Circuits, the U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of New York, Connecticut and the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the U.S. Supreme Court, and is registered to practice before the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Representative Cases:

Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, 2:10-cv-1699 (W.D. PA 2010)(representing plaintiff in a patent infringement case involving ventilation equipment);

Medgraph, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc., 09-cv-6610 (W. D. New York) (representing plaintiff in a patent infringement case involving computer-aided medical diagnosis and treatment);

Nicholas Colucci, d/b/a/ EZ Line Putters v. Callaway Golf Company, 6:08-cv-288 (E. D.  Texas) (represented plaintiff through trial in a patent jury case involving golf equipment);

Air Vent, Inc. v. Vent Right Corp., 2:08-cv-146 (W. D. Pennsylvania) (representing plaintiff in a patent infringement case involving roof ridge ventilators);

Goss International Americas, Inc. v. MAN Roland, Inc. and MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG,  C-03-513 (D. New Hampshire) (represented defendant in a patent infringement case involving printing presses);

Ahlstrom Windsor Locks LLC v. Schoeller & Hoesch, N.A., Inc. and P. H. Glatfelter Company,  3:03-CV-0169 (D. Connecticut) (represented plaintiff in a patent infringement case involving paper manufacturing);

AOB Properties Limited Partnership v. Wolf Medical Instruments Corp., 8:03-CV-1406 (M. D. Florida) (represented defendant in a patent infringement case involving medical devices);

Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. Inter*Act Systems, Inc., 3:98-CV-422 (D.  Connecticut) (represented plaintiff in a patent infringement case involving computer software);

C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Cordis Corporation, No. 89-0606-Z (D. Massachusetts) (represented C.R. Bard, Inc. in a patent infringement case involving medical devices);

In the Matter of Certain Aramid Fibers,  337 TA 194, (U.S. International Trade Commission) (represented the Du Pont Corporation in an infringement investigation concerning Kevlar patents);

Gerard  Metal Craftsmen v. American Brands, Inc. and Acme Visible Records, Inc., 3-79-0203 (N. D. Texas) (defended American Brands in a patent infringement action);

Hoganas AB v. The Babcock and Wilcox Company, CV 1- 85-240 (S. D. Georgia) (represented defendant in a patent infringement action);

The B.F. Goodrich Company v. Cellular Industries, Inc. et al., 13303 (D. Connecticut) (represented Goodrich in a patent and trade secrets case).

*Note that each case involves unique factual and legal circumstances and one cannot assume or conclude the same results in another case